EFFICIENCY AND CONTROVERSIES OF DETENTION ROOMS IN SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE PROS AND CONS
Kaydedildi:
| Yayımlandı: | Euromentor Journal vol. 16, no. 1 (Mar 2025), p. 90 |
|---|---|
| Yazar: | |
| Diğer Yazarlar: | |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Christian University Dimitrie Cantemir, Department of Education
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiketler: |
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3204366858 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2068-780X | ||
| 022 | |a 2247-9376 | ||
| 035 | |a 3204366858 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250301 |b d20250331 | |
| 084 | |a 173230 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sterian, Mihaela |u Associate Professor PhD., Dimitrie Cantemirv Christian University, The Faculty of Educational Sciences, Bucharest | |
| 245 | 1 | |a EFFICIENCY AND CONTROVERSIES OF DETENTION ROOMS IN SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE PROS AND CONS | |
| 260 | |b Christian University Dimitrie Cantemir, Department of Education |c Mar 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a In the context of contemporary challenges within educational systems, analysing the use of detention rooms is crucial to understanding their impact on students, teachers, and the school community. This study explores the pros and cons of detention rooms, highlighting their advantages, such as reducing disruptive behaviours, preventing total exclusion of students, and promoting respect for rules. It also addresses significant drawbacks, including negative psychological effects, inefficiency in behavior modification, and disproportionate application to disadvantaged groups. An ethical analysis based on principles such as autonomy, non-maleficence, justice, and beneficence reveals multiple challenges, ranging from social stigmatization of students to perpetuation ofracial and socio-economic inequalities. The study underscores the needfor adopting more inclusive and restorative educational approaches that promote students' holistic well-being and development. The findings provide a robust foundation for educational reforms aimed at balancing discipline with support, ultimately contributing to afair and student-centred school environment. | |
| 653 | |a Student behavior | ||
| 653 | |a Teaching | ||
| 653 | |a Education reform | ||
| 653 | |a School environment | ||
| 653 | |a Ethics | ||
| 653 | |a Teachers | ||
| 653 | |a Classrooms | ||
| 653 | |a Inclusion | ||
| 653 | |a Schools | ||
| 653 | |a Well being | ||
| 653 | |a Systematic review | ||
| 653 | |a Learning | ||
| 653 | |a At risk populations | ||
| 653 | |a Behavior modification | ||
| 653 | |a Education policy | ||
| 653 | |a Social inequality | ||
| 653 | |a Autonomy | ||
| 653 | |a Stigma | ||
| 653 | |a Social justice | ||
| 653 | |a Disadvantaged | ||
| 653 | |a Perpetuation | ||
| 653 | |a Minority groups | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a Educational systems | ||
| 653 | |a Detention | ||
| 653 | |a Educational inequality | ||
| 653 | |a Economic inequality | ||
| 653 | |a Student-centered learning | ||
| 653 | |a Psychological aspects | ||
| 653 | |a Socioeconomic factors | ||
| 653 | |a Student Development | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Finance | ||
| 653 | |a Suspension | ||
| 653 | |a Meta Analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Student Improvement | ||
| 653 | |a School Policy | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Environment | ||
| 653 | |a Behavior Problems | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Facilities Improvement | ||
| 653 | |a Individual Needs | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Needs | ||
| 653 | |a Controversial Issues (Course Content) | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Nicoară, Romulus-Dan |u PhD. Psychologist, Cluj County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Cluj / Associate Lecturer at the "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Euromentor Journal |g vol. 16, no. 1 (Mar 2025), p. 90 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Education Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3204366858/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3204366858/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3204366858/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |