Examining the Effects of Presentation-Practice-Production and Task-Based Language Teaching on Speaking Proficiency of EFL Learners

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Language Teaching and Research vol. 16, no. 4 (Jul 2025), p. 1067-1074
1. Verfasser: Tomita, Miho
Veröffentlicht:
Academy Publication Co., Ltd.
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3229255373
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1798-4769 
022 |a 2053-0684 
024 7 |a 10.17507/jltr.1604.02  |2 doi 
035 |a 3229255373 
045 2 |b d20250701  |b d20250731 
084 |a 125717  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Tomita, Miho  |u Department of Business Design, Faculty of Global Business, Showa Women's University, Japan 
245 1 |a Examining the Effects of Presentation-Practice-Production and Task-Based Language Teaching on Speaking Proficiency of EFL Learners 
260 |b Academy Publication Co., Ltd.  |c Jul 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Recently, task-based language teaching (TBLT), like many other pedagogical innovations, has been widely adopted and implemented in numerous language classrooms across Japan. However, in actual classrooms, many teachers still use drills and exercises or rely on the presentation-practice-production (PPP) framework to prevent the "fossilization of students errors". This study aims to compare the effectiveness of PPP and TBLT approaches in Japanese EFL-speaking classes, focusing on accuracy and fluency development. The participants were Japanese EFL students, both male and female, with an average age of 20. They were randomly assigned to the PPP and TBLT groups. Evaluation of learners' completion of the speaking pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest activities in both groups revealed that both approaches had an impact on both immediate and long-term results (one week). In particular, TBLT lessons appeared to be more effective than PPP lessons in improving learners' fluency. However, students in the PPP group outperformed those in the TBLT group in terms of accuracy on both the immediate and delayed posttests. 
651 4 |a Japan 
653 |a Pedagogy 
653 |a Accuracy 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Language acquisition 
653 |a Teaching methods 
653 |a Fluency 
653 |a Communication 
653 |a English as a second language 
653 |a Speaking 
653 |a Performance evaluation 
653 |a Teachers 
653 |a Skills 
653 |a Grammar 
653 |a Japanese language 
653 |a Classrooms 
653 |a Second language learning 
653 |a Learning outcomes 
653 |a English proficiency 
653 |a Task-based language teaching 
653 |a Language instruction 
653 |a Reading comprehension 
653 |a Listening 
653 |a Phonetics 
653 |a Education 
653 |a English as a second language instruction 
653 |a Production 
653 |a Errors 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Competence 
653 |a Delayed 
653 |a Innovations 
653 |a Language 
653 |a Groups 
773 0 |t Journal of Language Teaching and Research  |g vol. 16, no. 4 (Jul 2025), p. 1067-1074 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Career & Technical Education Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229255373/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229255373/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229255373/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch