Comparative analysis of ten-week high-intensity interval training, moderate-intensity continuous training, and proprioceptive workouts: Impact on cognitive abilities, body composition, perceived stress and motor skills

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:Journal of Physical Education and Sport vol. 25, no. 3 (Mar 2025), p. 460-469
Autor principal: Balogh, László
Altres autors: Szklenár, Eszter, Makra, Gabriella, Torma, Eszter, Rátgéber, László, Bíró, Eszter, Bács, Zalán, Pucsok, Márton József, Papp, Gábor
Publicat:
Universitatea din Pitesti
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3229930810
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2247-8051 
022 |a 2247-806X 
024 7 |a 10.7752/jpes.2025.03050  |2 doi 
035 |a 3229930810 
045 2 |b d20250301  |b d20250331 
084 |a 164144  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Balogh, László  |u Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Debrecen, HUNGARY 
245 1 |a Comparative analysis of ten-week high-intensity interval training, moderate-intensity continuous training, and proprioceptive workouts: Impact on cognitive abilities, body composition, perceived stress and motor skills 
260 |b Universitatea din Pitesti  |c Mar 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Purpose. With the emergence of diverse training methods, it is essential to conduct a comparative analysis of their effects, as each method influences the human body – considered a biopsychosocial entity – differently. Our comparative study aimed to explore the complex effects of proprioceptive training (ProprT), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on cognitive abilities, motor skills, body composition and perceived stress. The goal was to provide insights into effectively integrating these methods into educational and sport programs. Methods. One hundred forty-two healthy university students participated in the study. Participants voluntarily engaged in Pilates (n=22), yoga (n=29), functional circuit workouts (n=22), running club (n=23) or boot camp (n=46). Exercises were categorized into ProprT, MICT and HIIT based on established criteria for type and intensity zones. We conducted Hungarofit assessments, which included the Cooper test, push-up test, sit-up test and Flamingo balance test. Participants' body composition was analyzed, and cognitive functions were tested. Results. In Cooper test, only the MICT group showed significant improvement during the exercise program. On the other hand, the ProprT group exhibited a significant increase in total body mass, indicating that this training method was associated with the lowest calorie consumption. The most pronounced change in Borg scale values occured in the ProprT group, suggesting that lower-intensity training results in a more significant shift in the subjective level of effort. Changes in VTS COG/S8 test results highlight that exercise generally has a positive effect on cognitive abilities. Additionally, perceived stress levels decreased across all training types. Conclusion. Based on our observations, MICT may be the most effective method for improving students' aerobic capacity, while ProprT exercises may be particularly beneficial for enhancing cognitive abilities in public education. Notably, all three training types effectively reduce perceived stress. However, further comprehensive comparative analyses are needed to make personalized recommendations for individuals in public education and recreational athletes to determine which training method is the most optimal choice for their goals. 
653 |a Exercise 
653 |a Diabetes 
653 |a Physical fitness 
653 |a Maximum oxygen consumption 
653 |a Chronic illnesses 
653 |a Motor ability 
653 |a Cognitive ability 
653 |a Brain-derived neurotrophic factor 
653 |a Neuroplasticity 
653 |a Public schools 
653 |a Stress 
653 |a Interval training 
653 |a Methods 
653 |a Body composition 
653 |a Children & youth 
653 |a Teenagers 
653 |a Comparative analysis 
653 |a Heart rate 
653 |a Adolescents 
653 |a Physical Activities 
653 |a Teaching Methods 
653 |a Anatomy 
653 |a Student Improvement 
653 |a Public Education 
653 |a Chronic Illness 
653 |a Training Methods 
653 |a Human Body 
653 |a Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 
653 |a Adults 
653 |a Student Participation 
653 |a Cognitive Tests 
653 |a Comparative Education 
653 |a Muscular Strength 
700 1 |a Szklenár, Eszter  |u Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Debrecen, HUNGARY 
700 1 |a Makra, Gabriella  |u Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Debrecen, HUNGARY 
700 1 |a Torma, Eszter  |u Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Debrecen, HUNGARY 
700 1 |a Rátgéber, László  |u Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pecs, HUNGARY 
700 1 |a Bíró, Eszter 
700 1 |a Bács, Zalán 
700 1 |a Pucsok, Márton József 
700 1 |a Papp, Gábor 
773 0 |t Journal of Physical Education and Sport  |g vol. 25, no. 3 (Mar 2025), p. 460-469 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Consumer Health Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229930810/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229930810/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229930810/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch