Highly informative feedback using learning analytics: how feedback literacy moderates student perceptions of feedback

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education vol. 22, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 43
Autor principal: Weidlich, Joshua
Altres autors: Fink, Aron, Frey, Andreas, Jivet, Ioana, Gombert, Sebastian, Menzel, Lukas, Giorgashvili, Tornike, Yau, Jane, Drachsler, Hendrik
Publicat:
Springer Nature B.V.
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3230330690
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2365-9440 
022 |a 1698-580X 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s41239-025-00539-9  |2 doi 
035 |a 3230330690 
045 2 |b d20251201  |b d20251231 
084 |a 142233  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Weidlich, Joshua  |u University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650); Zurich University of Teacher Education, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.483054.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9666 1858); DIPF – Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.461683.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 1122) 
245 1 |a Highly informative feedback using learning analytics: how feedback literacy moderates student perceptions of feedback 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Dec 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Quality feedback is essential for supporting student learning in higher education, yet personalized feedback at scale remains costly. Advances in learning analytics and artificial intelligence now enable the automated delivery of personalized feedback to many students simultaneously. At the same time, recent feedback research increasingly emphasizes learner-centered approaches, particularly the role of feedback literacy—students' varying capacities to engage with and benefit from feedback. Despite growing interest, few studies have quantified how feedback literacy affects students' perceptions of feedback, especially in technology-supported contexts. To address this, we examined (1) students' perceptions of personalized, detailed feedback generated via learning analytics and (2) how feedback literacy moderated these perceptions. In a randomized field experiment, teacher education students (N = 196) participated in a week-long computer-supported collaborative learning task on cognitive activation in the classroom. Both groups received automated, personalized feedback: the control group received basic feedback on task completion, while the experimental group received detailed feedback on group processes and the quality of their collaborative statement. The highly informative feedback significantly improved perceptions of feedback helpfulness, enhanced learning insights, and supported self-reflection and self-regulation. Feedback literacy partially moderated these effects, influencing perceptions of feedback helpfulness and motivational regulation. 
653 |a Higher education 
653 |a Feedback 
653 |a Literacy 
653 |a Teacher education 
653 |a Student attitudes 
653 |a Collaborative virtual environments 
653 |a Educational technology 
653 |a Automation 
653 |a Cognitive tasks 
653 |a Distance learning 
653 |a Customization 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Motivation 
653 |a Perceptions 
653 |a Artificial intelligence 
653 |a Learning analytics 
653 |a Collaborative learning 
653 |a Helping behavior 
653 |a Collaboration 
653 |a Student teacher relationship 
653 |a Self control 
653 |a Teachers 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Task completion 
653 |a Student-centered learning 
653 |a Cooperative learning 
653 |a Selfreflection 
653 |a Group processes 
653 |a Educational activities 
653 |a Self regulation 
653 |a Regulation 
653 |a Groups 
653 |a Classrooms 
653 |a Incentives 
653 |a Literature Reviews 
653 |a Error Correction 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Attention Span 
653 |a Learning Processes 
653 |a Academic Achievement 
653 |a Researchers 
653 |a Learning Theories 
653 |a Meta Analysis 
653 |a Intelligence 
653 |a Electronic Learning 
653 |a Individual Differences 
653 |a Formative Evaluation 
653 |a Emotional Response 
653 |a Learner Engagement 
653 |a Programming 
700 1 |a Fink, Aron  |u Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721) 
700 1 |a Frey, Andreas  |u Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721) 
700 1 |a Jivet, Ioana  |u DIPF – Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.461683.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 1122); Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721); FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany (GRID:grid.31730.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 1534 0348) 
700 1 |a Gombert, Sebastian  |u DIPF – Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.461683.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 1122) 
700 1 |a Menzel, Lukas  |u Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721) 
700 1 |a Giorgashvili, Tornike  |u Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721) 
700 1 |a Yau, Jane  |u DIPF – Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.461683.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 1122) 
700 1 |a Drachsler, Hendrik  |u DIPF – Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.461683.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 1122); Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721); Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.36120.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 0501 5439) 
773 0 |t International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education  |g vol. 22, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 43 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Political Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3230330690/abstract/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3230330690/fulltext/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3230330690/fulltextPDF/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch