Cognate facilitation in bilingual reading: The influence of orthographic and phonological similarity on lexical decisions and eye-movements

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Bilingualism vol. 27, no. 5 (Nov 2024), p. 964
Autor principal: Tiffin-Richards, Simon P
Publicado:
Cambridge University Press
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3248695775
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1366-7289 
022 |a 1469-1841 
024 7 |a 10.1017/S1366728923000949  |2 doi 
035 |a 3248695775 
045 2 |b d20241101  |b d20241130 
084 |a 79004  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Tiffin-Richards, Simon P  |u Department of Psychology IV, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany 
245 1 |a Cognate facilitation in bilingual reading: The influence of orthographic and phonological similarity on lexical decisions and eye-movements 
260 |b Cambridge University Press  |c Nov 2024 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a A central finding of bilingual research is that cognates – words that share semantic, phonological, and orthographic characteristics across languages – are processed faster than non-cognate words. However, it remains unclear whether cognate facilitation effects are reliant on identical cognates, or whether facilitation simply varies along a continuum of cross-language orthographic and phonological similarity. In two experiments, German–English bilinguals read identical cognates, close cognates, and non-cognates in a lexical decision task and a sentence-reading task while their eye movements were recorded. Participants read the stimuli in their L1 German and L2 English. Converging results found comparable facilitation effects of identical and close cognates vs. non-cognates. Cognate facilitation could be described as a continuous linear effect of cross-language orthographic similarity on lexical decision accuracy and latency, as well as fixation durations. Cross-language phonological similarity modulated the continuous orthographic similarity effect in single word recognition, but not in sentence processing. 
653 |a Language 
653 |a Syntactic processing 
653 |a Orthographic similarity 
653 |a Phonology 
653 |a Influence 
653 |a Lexical decision task 
653 |a Semantics 
653 |a Eye movements 
653 |a Cognates 
653 |a Word recognition 
653 |a Phonological similarity 
653 |a Bilingualism 
653 |a German language 
653 |a Multilingualism 
653 |a Experiments 
653 |a Latency 
653 |a English language 
653 |a Decisions 
653 |a Bilingual people 
653 |a Fixation 
653 |a Languages 
653 |a Words 
653 |a Motor Reactions 
653 |a Spelling 
653 |a Individualized Instruction 
653 |a Sentences 
653 |a Pronunciation 
653 |a Reading Research 
653 |a Phonemes 
653 |a Romance Languages 
653 |a Language Proficiency 
653 |a Language Processing 
653 |a Computational Linguistics 
773 0 |t Bilingualism  |g vol. 27, no. 5 (Nov 2024), p. 964 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Arts & Humanities Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3248695775/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3248695775/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3248695775/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch