Balancing Affective Engagement and Cognitive Load in Generative-AI-Based Learning: Empathy, Immersion, and Emotional Design in Design Education
Guardado en:
| 發表在: | Education Sciences vol. 15, no. 11 (2025), p. 1478-1496 |
|---|---|
| 主要作者: | |
| 其他作者: | , |
| 出版: |
MDPI AG
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| 標簽: |
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3275510490 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2227-7102 | ||
| 022 | |a 2076-3344 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/educsci15111478 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3275510490 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 231457 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lee, Wonsub |u Department of Design and Arts Management, College of Design and Arts, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea; dldnjstjq87@hongik.ac.kr | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Balancing Affective Engagement and Cognitive Load in Generative-AI-Based Learning: Empathy, Immersion, and Emotional Design in Design Education | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a As higher education undergoes rapid transformation driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI), the integration of Generative AI (GenAI) has become essential for preparing future-ready creative professionals. In this context, design education plays a leading role in exploring how GenAI can enhance students’ experiential learning. This study empirically examined how three experience dimensions—Educational, Entertainment, and Aesthetic—shape Empathy, Immersion, Satisfaction, and Learning Outcomes in a GenAI-based self-character workshop. A total of 185 design students participated, and the data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results revealed that both Entertainment (β = 0.334, p < 0.001) and Aesthetic (β = 0.434, p < 0.001) experiences significantly and positively predicted Empathy and also increased Immersion (β = 0.215, p < 0.001; β = 0.154, p < 0.05). In contrast, Educational experience showed a non-significant or slightly negative effect. Furthermore, Empathy enhanced Immersion (β = 0.220, p < 0.01), Satisfaction (β = 0.173, p < 0.05), and Learning Outcomes (β = 0.305, p < 0.001). Immersion also improved Learning Outcomes (β = 0.253, p < 0.05) but slightly reduced short-term Satisfaction (β = −0.186, p < 0.05), indicating a cognitive-load trade-off between concentration and immediate enjoyment. These findings demonstrate that GenAI-based creative activities can effectively foster both emotional engagement and learning performance when instructional design minimizes unnecessary cognitive burden. The study contributes to understanding how emotionally meaningful and aesthetically engaging experiences can advance AI-integrated design education in the digital transformation era. | |
| 653 | |a Pedagogy | ||
| 653 | |a Higher education | ||
| 653 | |a Collaboration | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive load | ||
| 653 | |a Learning activities | ||
| 653 | |a Design education | ||
| 653 | |a Chatbots | ||
| 653 | |a Efficiency | ||
| 653 | |a Motivation | ||
| 653 | |a Perceptions | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Educational objectives | ||
| 653 | |a Experiential learning | ||
| 653 | |a Authorship | ||
| 653 | |a Empathy | ||
| 653 | |a Creativity | ||
| 653 | |a Immersive learning | ||
| 653 | |a Digital literacy | ||
| 653 | |a Generative artificial intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Benefits | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Practices | ||
| 653 | |a Influence of Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Reflection | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Processes | ||
| 653 | |a Direct Instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Experience | ||
| 653 | |a Literacy | ||
| 653 | |a Instructional Materials | ||
| 653 | |a Cooperative Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Creative Activities | ||
| 653 | |a Ethics | ||
| 653 | |a Instructional Effectiveness | ||
| 653 | |a Evaluative Thinking | ||
| 653 | |a Outcomes of Education | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Experience | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive Ability | ||
| 653 | |a Learner Engagement | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Chang Sungbok |u Department of Digital Media Design, College of Arts, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28496, Republic of Korea | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Suh Jungho |u Department of Media Communication, College of Social Science, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Education Sciences |g vol. 15, no. 11 (2025), p. 1478-1496 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Education Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3275510490/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3275510490/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3275510490/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |