Does Tracking of Students Bias Value-Added Estimates for Teachers?
Đã lưu trong:
| Xuất bản năm: | IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc (2013), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Tác giả chính: | |
| Tác giả khác: | , , , |
| Được phát hành: |
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Các nhãn: |
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Bài tóm tắt: | This working paper uses urban school district data to investigate whether including track indicators or accounting for classroom characteristics in the value-added model is sufficient to eliminate potential bias resulting from the sorting of students into academic tracks. Accounting for two classroom characteristicsâ[euro]"mean classroom achievement and the standard deviation of classroom achievementâ[euro]"may reduce bias for middle school math teachers, whereas track indicators help for high school reading teachers. However, including both of these measures simultaneously reduces the precision of the value-added estimates in this context. While these different specifications produce substantially different value-added estimates, they produce small changes in the tails of value-added distribution. |
|---|---|
| Nguồn: | ABI/INFORM Global |