Should BIBFRAME Die?
I tiakina i:
| I whakaputaina i: | Technicalities vol. 45, no. 3 (May/Jun 2025), p. 18 |
|---|---|
| Kaituhi matua: | |
| I whakaputaina: |
Media Periodicals Division, The Kansas City Gardener, Inc.
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
| Whakarāpopotonga: | Edmunds states that training, technology, documentation, and staff development costs would be high, citing evidence presented by other notable library scholars, including Marshall Breeding, as well as financial cost information associated with grant-funded BIBFRAME efforts. According to Edmunds, Clarivate and (the much smaller but relevant) EBSCO will dominate the library landscape. While leasing or remote access to library materials is not new, Edmunds is correct that today's landscape of e-books and other digital content (Overdrive, Hoopla, etc.) are the norm. Edmunds highlights the irony of RDA development (in the context of BIBFRAME, the Library Reference Model (LRM), and library linked data) in truly addressing the realities presented by digital content presentation and discovery." |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0272-0884 |
| Puna: | Library Science Database |