Should BIBFRAME Die?

Guardado en:
Bibliografiske detaljer
Udgivet i:Technicalities vol. 45, no. 3 (May/Jun 2025), p. 18
Hovedforfatter: Adamich, Tom
Udgivet:
Media Periodicals Division, The Kansas City Gardener, Inc.
Fag:
Online adgang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
Beskrivelse
Resumen:Edmunds states that training, technology, documentation, and staff development costs would be high, citing evidence presented by other notable library scholars, including Marshall Breeding, as well as financial cost information associated with grant-funded BIBFRAME efforts. According to Edmunds, Clarivate and (the much smaller but relevant) EBSCO will dominate the library landscape. While leasing or remote access to library materials is not new, Edmunds is correct that today's landscape of e-books and other digital content (Overdrive, Hoopla, etc.) are the norm. Edmunds highlights the irony of RDA development (in the context of BIBFRAME, the Library Reference Model (LRM), and library linked data) in truly addressing the realities presented by digital content presentation and discovery."
ISSN:0272-0884
Fuente:Library Science Database