Should BIBFRAME Die?

Збережено в:

Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в::	Technicalities vol. 45, no. 3 (May/Jun 2025), p. 18
Автор:	Adamich, Tom
Опубліковано:	Media Periodicals Division, The Kansas City Gardener, Inc.
Предмети:	Library of Congress Online Computer Library Center > OCLC Library collections Librarians Library materials Libraries Metadata Linked Data Resource Description & Access-RDA Library catalogs Access to materials Interlibrary loans
Онлайн доступ:	Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF
Теги:	Додати тег Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!

Опис
Короткий огляд:	Edmunds states that training, technology, documentation, and staff development costs would be high, citing evidence presented by other notable library scholars, including Marshall Breeding, as well as financial cost information associated with grant-funded BIBFRAME efforts. According to Edmunds, Clarivate and (the much smaller but relevant) EBSCO will dominate the library landscape. While leasing or remote access to library materials is not new, Edmunds is correct that today's landscape of e-books and other digital content (Overdrive, Hoopla, etc.) are the norm. Edmunds highlights the irony of RDA development (in the context of BIBFRAME, the Library Reference Model (LRM), and library linked data) in truly addressing the realities presented by digital content presentation and discovery."
ISSN:	0272-0884
Джерело:	Library Science Database