(Unlearned) lessons from John Graunt and Kenneth Rothman: A "CLASSic" example
保存先:
| 出版年: | Clinical Therapeutics vol. 25, no. 11 (Nov 2003), p. 2891 |
|---|---|
| 第一著者: | |
| 団体著者: | |
| その他の著者: | |
| 出版事項: |
Elsevier Limited
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン・アクセス: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| タグ: |
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
| 抄録: | This commentary reviews the work of John Graunt and Kenneth J. Rothman on statistical significance and the need for prespecification of study end points. The authors argue that it is dangerous to substitute oversimplifications based exclusively on whether a result has reached statistical significance for a rational process of causal inference. An example is given based on the Celecoxib Lonngterm Arthritis Safety Study. This commentary reviews the work of John Graunt and Kenneth J. Rothman on statistical significance and the need for prespecification of study end points. The authors argue that it is dangerous to substitute oversimplifications based exclusively on whether a result has reached statistical significance for a rational process of causal inference. An example is given based on the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0149-2918 1879-114X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80341-7 |
| ソース: | Healthcare Administration Database |