(Unlearned) lessons from John Graunt and Kenneth Rothman: A "CLASSic" example
Збережено в:
| Опубліковано в:: | Clinical Therapeutics vol. 25, no. 11 (Nov 2003), p. 2891 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Співавтор: | |
| Інші автори: | |
| Опубліковано: |
Elsevier Limited
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Теги: |
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Короткий огляд: | This commentary reviews the work of John Graunt and Kenneth J. Rothman on statistical significance and the need for prespecification of study end points. The authors argue that it is dangerous to substitute oversimplifications based exclusively on whether a result has reached statistical significance for a rational process of causal inference. An example is given based on the Celecoxib Lonngterm Arthritis Safety Study. This commentary reviews the work of John Graunt and Kenneth J. Rothman on statistical significance and the need for prespecification of study end points. The authors argue that it is dangerous to substitute oversimplifications based exclusively on whether a result has reached statistical significance for a rational process of causal inference. An example is given based on the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0149-2918 1879-114X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80341-7 |
| Джерело: | Healthcare Administration Database |