(Unlearned) lessons from John Graunt and Kenneth Rothman: A "CLASSic" example
Сохранить в:
| Опубликовано в:: | Clinical Therapeutics vol. 25, no. 11 (Nov 2003), p. 2891 |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Соавтор: | |
| Другие авторы: | |
| Опубликовано: |
Elsevier Limited
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Метки: |
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| Краткий обзор: | This commentary reviews the work of John Graunt and Kenneth J. Rothman on statistical significance and the need for prespecification of study end points. The authors argue that it is dangerous to substitute oversimplifications based exclusively on whether a result has reached statistical significance for a rational process of causal inference. An example is given based on the Celecoxib Lonngterm Arthritis Safety Study. This commentary reviews the work of John Graunt and Kenneth J. Rothman on statistical significance and the need for prespecification of study end points. The authors argue that it is dangerous to substitute oversimplifications based exclusively on whether a result has reached statistical significance for a rational process of causal inference. An example is given based on the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0149-2918 1879-114X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80341-7 |
| Источник: | Healthcare Administration Database |